Published on
Just-in-time training promises something every engineering leader wants: guidance delivered at the exact moment a developer needs it. If a static analysis tool flags a SQL Injection, a JIT module pops up with a short explanation of how to prevent it. The idea sounds appealing. It feels efficient. It delivers only what is needed, right when it is needed, and avoids the overload of generic courses. On paper, it keeps developers “in the flow.”
In reality, the execution tells a different story.
The Cost of Interrupting Developer Flow
Developers work in a deep-focus state. Interrupting that focus, even for a short “helpful” lesson, comes with a heavy price. Research shows it can take 20 minutes to an hour to regain full concentration after a disruption. When a JIT popup fires at the wrong time, it derails the work. It is not supporting the developer. It is obstructing them.
This is why JIT content is often ignored. If a developer is trying to hit a deadline, the natural response to a mid-flow training prompt is to skip it. The intention is good. The real-world result is poor.
Low Engagement and Training That Gets Ignored
When training becomes a speed bump rather than a value-add, it gets bypassed. Developers quickly learn that JIT material is optional and rarely urgent. Over time, JIT tips become noise. They get clicked away, minimized, or ignored entirely. Some organizations find that developers engage with these prompts less and less over time, turning what should be meaningful guidance into a persistent annoyance.
The industry line sums it up well: JIT “briefs well but does not deliver.”
Reactive Instead of Preventive
JIT training teaches developers only after they have created a problem. It does nothing to help them avoid different vulnerabilities they have not yet encountered. Developers learn how to fix one instance, but not the principle behind it. The learning is narrow. Future issues still slip through.
It is security education driven by symptoms instead of causes.
Shallow Retention and Repeat Mistakes
Because JIT focuses on the immediate fix, it rarely creates lasting understanding. It is the equivalent of reading a recipe while cooking. It helps in the moment, but the details rarely stick.
Developers fix the flagged issue but often do not internalize the security concept. When the context changes, the same mistake appears again in a new form. JIT becomes a repetitive cycle of whack-a-mole, not a path to mastery.
Time Pressure Removes Any Chance of Success
Under time pressure, developers will always choose shipping code over training. Even if a JIT module looks relevant, they will defer it with good intentions to “come back later.” Later rarely happens. Without meaningful time set aside for learning, even the best JIT content falls flat.
JIT Has Benefits in Theory, But Struggles in Practice
Developers appreciate relevant, targeted guidance. When integrated thoughtfully, JIT can reinforce skills at the moment they are applied. The issue is not the concept. The issue is poor timing, poor integration, and an overestimation of how much developers can absorb during active coding.
This is why JIT works best as a supplement, not the foundation.
Adaptive Training - Personalized, Ongoing Learning That Sticks
Adaptive training takes a proactive approach. It does not wait for vulnerabilities to appear. Instead, it identifies patterns, skill gaps, and common problem areas across teams. Based on this data, it delivers personalized training that goes deeper than a quick tip.
Critically, it is delivered at the right time. Not during a coding session. Not mid-sprint. Instead, it fits into the development lifecycle in an intentional way.
Focus on Root Causes Instead of Surface Errors
Adaptive programs teach underlying principles. If developers repeatedly misuse cryptographic APIs, adaptive training covers the entire topic, not one instance. This builds durable knowledge that carries forward into future work.
Scheduled Learning With No Disruption
Instead of interrupting workflow, adaptive programs create space for intentional learning. This could be one hour per sprint. It could be a checkpoint during onboarding. It could be on-demand content that developers pull when they are ready. The key is timing. Developers learn when they are able to focus, not when they are coding.
Higher Retention Through Depth and Practice
Adaptive training uses hands-on labs, challenges, examples, and repetition to build true understanding. Developers learn why a vulnerability matters and how to prevent it across different contexts. This builds the mental models that support long-term secure coding habits.
Builds a Security Mindset and Culture
Proactive education signals that security is part of thecraft, not an afterthought. Developersstart thinking about security before they commit code. Over time, teams build internal securitychampions who help raise the bar across the organization.
This is how mature engineering organizations operate.
Reduces Future Vulnerabilities and Firefighting
The result of adaptive training is simple: fewer vulnerabilities introduced over time. Developers write secure code by default, which reduces rework and emergency patch cycles. Organizations that invest in continuous training see measurable improvements in developer performance and code quality.
Better Engagement With Modern Methods
Gamification, tournaments, certifications, and real-worldexamples make adaptive learning far more engaging than popups or stalecompliance decks. When training is enjoyable and relevant, participation increases naturally.
Most Important - Measurable Skill Growth
Adaptive programs track progress. Teams can see improvements, identify common weaknesses, and adjust the curriculum. Metrics like vulnerability remediation speed and code quality move in the right direction. This level of insight is impossible with JIT tips.
The Bottom Line
Just-in-time training sounds efficient, but in practice it disrupts workflow, leads to shallow learning, and fails to change long-term behavior. Adaptive training creates lasting expertise, reduces vulnerabilities, and improves developer engagement. It requires investment, but the long-term payoff is clear.
If the goal is to build secure developers rather than fix insecure code, adaptive training is the path that works.
Read more from:
Secure Coding Training